It's not what you think
Wonderful time line commentary by John Hawkins. We unsubscribed from everything Project Veritas and will look forward to following James O'Keefe to his next organization that he sets up. He should name it Project Phoenix.
When your biggest consumer is conservatives and your biggest donors are self made men it is idiotic to push a guy out of the company he created and built. It doesn't look good from any angle. I don't care if he was mean to his employees, it was his company. I'll go back if he goes back and the board resigns. Until then, they are dead to me.
Thanks for this. Sad to see Project Veritas add another "s" to its name.
This is what I suspected: it wasn’t Pfizer, it was internal politics. Thanks for your insight.
A) Dumb board, B) All lizards, C) Fire the complainers, D) Put in a new board elected by the donors, E) And publish pictures of the existing board and the complainers so their future is assured.....(why not, that is what they attempted to do to O'keefe). F) And James, sue each of them for degamation of character and whatever other possible infringement ........done. Now I go spit!
John, do you have an email account for subscribers to send you suggestions? For one, I'd be interested in your take about one of your favorites, Jonah Goldberg, who jumped on the dog pile against Matt Walsh, which is just his latest attack on a conservative- Tucker Carlson being his most frequent target. He liked a tweet by someone who said that Matt Walsh should be fired from his own show for talking honestly about the ugly truths of transgender surgery on minors. Thanks.
The boards actions make it clear they are motivated by and loyal to forces external to the organisation. Therefore they have no problem with the organisation being ridden into the ground by their actions, as such, expecting their capitulation is naive. Next time James should be careful not to hire any Goldman Sachs ex-goons, they all have enough skeletons in their closet to get eppsteined (ie. leveraging compromat to coerce required behaviour) in 5 seconds, the other red flag was the pronouns in bio on linkedin that one of the directors has lol.
Why is there no serious reporting going on? This article, like so many, just paints war between JOK and the board. No nuance.
In the minutes slides show in the video two of the five board members voted against suspending O’Keefe BOTH TIMES. Yes all articles are written as if the whole board was against him.
Such simpleton story angles when reality is way more detailed.