The Six-Step Guide to Destroying the West

The original author of this is unknown, but it feels like there’s a lot of validity to what they wrote:

If your goal was to destroy the West, this is an agenda that makes it happen.

1) Convince women to hate men: What happens if women and men don’t breed? Your society dies. How do you convince women not to breed with men, which is something they’ve been doing since the beginning of time? Well, what if you told women that you absolutely want them to find love, get married, and have children, BUT of course, they should have high standards. Who could have a problem with that? Do you want women to settle for bums? How would that benefit them, right?

Then, the next step is convincing women to set those basic standards so high that they rule out most of the male population. For example, a woman might say, “Why should I settle for a man who isn’t even as tall as me? How is he going to protect me?” In and of itself, that’s not a big problem since women are typically shorter than men, but over time, that has morphed into this:

In the time when few women worked or got college degrees, it made sense that a woman wanted a man who was better educated than her and made more money than she did. How else was he going to support the family? Today, the median woman in America makes about 80% of what the median man does. It’s hard to say definitively, but that probably equates to 30-40% of women who make MORE than the median man’s salary. So, those guys get ruled out right off the bat by a large chunk of the female population.

Additionally, most women want a man who is at least as educated as they are, which seems like it makes sense, until you consider that women are now getting roughly 59% of the college degrees.

Furthermore, we could debate why this is, but most women now say that they find the vast majority of men unattractive.

Of course, we also can’t forget that many of the most desirable men who check all of these boxes are going to already be married or in serious long-term relationships because they have an enormous number of women to choose from.

Next thing you know, it’s “where did all the good men go?”

Now, add on a layer of bizarre feminist propaganda that claims women are constantly in danger from men everywhere they go, that men are generally terrible people, and that we somehow live in a “patriarchy,” and you get increasing amounts of outright hatred.

2) Convince men to hate themselves: The amount of outright abuse dumped on young men in America is staggering. If you’re interested in digging into it, there are a lot of articles discussing it here at Culturcidal:

Disney’s “Boy Trouble”

The Left’s War on Straight, White, Masculine Men

Telling Men’s Side of the Story

Why Statistics Show Young Men Have Gone Conservative

Sorry Liberals, We’re Not Redefining Masculinity to Make it Gay and Feminine

Why Are So Many Men Checking Out of Society?

If you summed all these articles up, it’s men being told they’re BAD over and over and over again in different ways. Masculinity? Bad. The things men like? Bad. Men succeeding? Bad. Men failing? Bad. Women failing? It’s because of bad men. Men failing to get women? It’s because men are bad. Men not being enough like women? It’s also because they’re bad. Should men be helped? No, because they’re bad. Maybe we’re being a little unfair to men… unfair to men? Don’t you know they’re bad? This message is pushed relentlessly throughout our society.

Not every man pays attention to this, but some men have internalized this hatred, some have become bitter, and others have just given up in the face of it. That might sound like no big deal until you realize we’re talking about tens of millions of guys here.

You break men, you break our society.

3) Convince minorities to hate whites and 4) Convince whites to hate themselves: A multi-racial society is completely incompatible with a society where people are encouraged to hate each other because of their race. Yet, encouraging exactly that kind of hatred is a core part of the Democrat Party’s electoral strategy. Many things on this list are a mixture of changes that happened naturally, combined with a few bad actors getting involved.

On the other hand, these problems have almost entirely been created by the Left for purely political reasons. Liberals relentlessly push the idea that white people are bad and deserve to be discriminated against because of their skin color (although they almost always find ways to exempt themselves) while simultaneously promoting the idea that minorities in America are being just as relentlessly suppressed by white Americans as they were when Jim Crow laws were still in full effect. This is so obviously not so it shouldn’t even need to be proven, but if you do need proof, this should do it:

The message hammered home endlessly by the Left in America is that liberal minorities should be given every advantage to make up for the fact that white Americans are discriminating against them. Of course, they believe we also need lots of white liberals around to fight for black and liberal Hispanics, because those poor incompetents just couldn’t manage it themselves.

How liberals can claim to believe that the only thing holding black and Hispanic Americans back is discrimination and simultaneously think they’re not even competent enough to get driver’s licenses to vote is unknown, but that is somehow their position.

The end result of all this is that the Left in America openly advocates for discriminating against white Americans via Affirmative Action, DEI, and Critical Race Theory. They justify this by attempting to convince EVERYBODY to hate white Americans. It’s a completely immoral strategy, but they have gotten away with it so far.

5) Convince the Young to be LGBTQIA+: There was legitimately a time in America, not so long ago, when gay Americans were disliked by the wider culture and weren’t treated very well. Eventually, the American people rejected that idea, and a serious effort was made to increase tolerance for gay Americans. Some of this was healthy, like encouraging parents not to reject their gay kids or opposing open discrimination against gay Americans. Some of it also wasn’t very healthy, like refusing to shut down gay bathhouses where AIDS was being rampantly spread, obscene Pride parades and gay marriage.

However, over time, encouraging tolerance for gay Americans started to become, “Gay Americans are beyond criticism,” and “Hey kids, if you want more people to like you, you should be gay.” This was pushed by corporations and schools dominated by liberals, and it worked:

There’s a world of difference between saying, “You shouldn’t hate people for being gay,” which seems like a healthy approach to take to the issue, and encouraging people to be gay, which is a horrible idea for a wide variety of obvious reasons.

Similarly, the whole idea that some weird guy can throw on a wig, call himself Linda, and no one can ask if he’s having a mental health episode because the Alphabet Mafia will yell at them if they do isn’t a good thing either. Our society has gone way, way too far in this direction, and although we don’t need to turn into Iran, we desperately need to get back to a much more middle-of-the-road path on this topic.

6) Convince the old that they’re backward: Older generations are supposed to be voices of reason and wisdom for society. That doesn’t mean they don’t have bad actors or are always right, but simply having a lot of lived experience is a huge advantage. It’s one thing to read a book or theorize how something should play out but having seen it happen again and again will teach you a lot.

One of the big problems with our society isn’t that we’ve convinced the old that they’re backward per se, it’s that we have come to value entertainment far more than wisdom. There are far more people willing to watch some gorgeous, but screechy woman or loud-mouthed young male influencer rant about things they know very little about than listen to someone older, smarter, and wiser, who didn’t start practicing making over-the-top facial expressions on video at age 15.

In other words, if the choice is between spending an hour going, “I can’t believe he said that” and “Oooh, he got him;” and “Oh wow, that’s going to really help me” and “I didn’t know it worked like that,” the majority of people now go with the former.

Because of this, many of us have willingly cut ourselves off from many of the smartest, wisest, and most experienced voices in our country. It’s not that these people don’t have a lot to offer; it’s that most people in our society aren’t listening to what they have to say. At the end of the day, they’ll probably be fine, but will we? That is much harder to say.

---