"Hard evidence is coming in from the United Kingdom, and it conclusively establishes that the vaccines are NOT reducing the likelihood of a Covid-infected person dying."
The article is not up to normal standards by this author. The more unvaccinated, the more mutations, the more chance of a variant with no effect from the vaccines.
If you could get a shot that prevented the many other ways to die that are mentioned, would you get it? That is an inane argument. Like saying if we allow guns, why not allow hand grenades and bazookas? Polio was eliminated not just for the generation getting vaccinated, but for future generations. Same as smallpox. This article is short sighted and definitely not big picture.
"If you want a world without COVID, maybe you’ll get it one day, but you can't have it now. If you want herd immunity and no variants, you can't have that either because even if every person in the United States were vaccinated, the variants would still spread in the other countries and eventually be flown here. If you are vaccinated or have already had it, the reality is that’s about as safe as it gets from COVID for a while."
The variants are going to continue to spread in other countries and then they will arrive here. If 100% of the population were vaccinated, it wouldn't stop that from happening.
Vaccines exist to do one thing, and one thing only: Reproduce.
If a vaccine kills off everyone it infects, will it be able to reproduce? NO! If a vaccine makes people violently ill so that humans will want to avoid the sick, will it be able to reproduce? NO!
Polio was not an example of viral evolution. The polio outbreak of the early-to-mid 20th century occurred because sanitation was better. Counterintuitive, you say? Yes, but true. Polio causes mild flu-like symptoms before it goes on to attack the central nervous system; if you get it in your first couple of years of life, it probably won't paralyze you. Modern sanitation tended to delay polio transmission so that a higher percentage of kids above the age of 3 got it, and were far more likely to suffer its most devastating effects.
"What about the Spanish Flu outbreak of 1918," you ask? Once again, it may sound rather incredible, but that was not an example of "viral evolution." You can thank President Woodrow Wilson, Progressive-extraordinaire, Democrat, and warmonger, for causing a super-spreader event with his troop movements during World War I. Upwards of 90% of the flu deaths in 1918 were traced back to the battlefront, and a significant number of those who died were actually poisoned by European doctors with aspirin overdoses.
If we just let the goddam virus evolve, it would do what viruses do: Get *more* transmissible *and less* deadly. For the love of God Almighty and all that is sacred, I really wish you people would quit drinking the media koolaid.
Also worth noting, the "Spanish Flu" probably originated in the United States. Our federal government conspired with the UK to cover up the truth about its existence in Europe, ergo a Spanish newspaper ended up being the first to report honestly on it.
More people get infected and more variants of the virus get made, most ar ineffective but in some case, as we have seen, a variant can emerge and be worst than the original. That's why you should still get vaccinated, because if you don't you are still part of the problem.
Variants are worse than the original because we are ****ing with RNA. Coronavirus vaccination has been a holy grail of veterinary medicine for nearly a century, but we haven't gotten it right yet in cattle because of ADE -- antibody-dependent enhancement. Vaccinated cattle get *more* sick than unvaccinated cattle.
Do you think that might, just possible, at least theoretically, be the case with these mRNA sequencer-pseudovaccines?
BTW maybe if the Vax manufacturers included some folks over the age of 70 with one or more comorbidities as well as others who were obese and also had one or more comorbidities the jabs might not have ended up “95% effective”. So let me get this straight, I must get an emergency use therapeutic that doesn’t prevent me from catching Covid, doesn’t prevent me from passing covid and based on recent data doesn’t even reduce the viral load CD and unvaxxed person who tests positive? Once again of the vaccines work, why do you care if I choose not to get one?
they have not even proven the virus is real......it is a fear campaign to gain complete natzi style control over you.
I mean, there are a lot of things that can be argued over, but there's definitely a virus.
"Hard evidence is coming in from the United Kingdom, and it conclusively establishes that the vaccines are NOT reducing the likelihood of a Covid-infected person dying."
https://voxday.net/2021/08/25/vaccinated-5x-more-likely-to-die/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/tY1l69AVSa9z/
they are counting "cases" from the flawed PCR tests, because nobody is dyeing.
The article is not up to normal standards by this author. The more unvaccinated, the more mutations, the more chance of a variant with no effect from the vaccines.
If you could get a shot that prevented the many other ways to die that are mentioned, would you get it? That is an inane argument. Like saying if we allow guns, why not allow hand grenades and bazookas? Polio was eliminated not just for the generation getting vaccinated, but for future generations. Same as smallpox. This article is short sighted and definitely not big picture.
Actually, I covered that part in the article.
"If you want a world without COVID, maybe you’ll get it one day, but you can't have it now. If you want herd immunity and no variants, you can't have that either because even if every person in the United States were vaccinated, the variants would still spread in the other countries and eventually be flown here. If you are vaccinated or have already had it, the reality is that’s about as safe as it gets from COVID for a while."
The variants are going to continue to spread in other countries and then they will arrive here. If 100% of the population were vaccinated, it wouldn't stop that from happening.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/tY1l69AVSa9z/
Vaccines exist to do one thing, and one thing only: Reproduce.
If a vaccine kills off everyone it infects, will it be able to reproduce? NO! If a vaccine makes people violently ill so that humans will want to avoid the sick, will it be able to reproduce? NO!
Polio was not an example of viral evolution. The polio outbreak of the early-to-mid 20th century occurred because sanitation was better. Counterintuitive, you say? Yes, but true. Polio causes mild flu-like symptoms before it goes on to attack the central nervous system; if you get it in your first couple of years of life, it probably won't paralyze you. Modern sanitation tended to delay polio transmission so that a higher percentage of kids above the age of 3 got it, and were far more likely to suffer its most devastating effects.
"What about the Spanish Flu outbreak of 1918," you ask? Once again, it may sound rather incredible, but that was not an example of "viral evolution." You can thank President Woodrow Wilson, Progressive-extraordinaire, Democrat, and warmonger, for causing a super-spreader event with his troop movements during World War I. Upwards of 90% of the flu deaths in 1918 were traced back to the battlefront, and a significant number of those who died were actually poisoned by European doctors with aspirin overdoses.
If we just let the goddam virus evolve, it would do what viruses do: Get *more* transmissible *and less* deadly. For the love of God Almighty and all that is sacred, I really wish you people would quit drinking the media koolaid.
Also worth noting, the "Spanish Flu" probably originated in the United States. Our federal government conspired with the UK to cover up the truth about its existence in Europe, ergo a Spanish newspaper ended up being the first to report honestly on it.
they have never isolated the covid-19 virus.....they cant claim a variant exists. They cant actually prove covid-19 exists at all.
More people get infected and more variants of the virus get made, most ar ineffective but in some case, as we have seen, a variant can emerge and be worst than the original. That's why you should still get vaccinated, because if you don't you are still part of the problem.
Variants are worse than the original because we are ****ing with RNA. Coronavirus vaccination has been a holy grail of veterinary medicine for nearly a century, but we haven't gotten it right yet in cattle because of ADE -- antibody-dependent enhancement. Vaccinated cattle get *more* sick than unvaccinated cattle.
Do you think that might, just possible, at least theoretically, be the case with these mRNA sequencer-pseudovaccines?
https://www.bitchute.com/video/tY1l69AVSa9z/
How long before you start making us wear yellow stars, or trucking us off to Camp Reeducation, for your "safety".
It's OUR safety
But you got the vaccine. Do they work or not?
BTW maybe if the Vax manufacturers included some folks over the age of 70 with one or more comorbidities as well as others who were obese and also had one or more comorbidities the jabs might not have ended up “95% effective”. So let me get this straight, I must get an emergency use therapeutic that doesn’t prevent me from catching Covid, doesn’t prevent me from passing covid and based on recent data doesn’t even reduce the viral load CD and unvaxxed person who tests positive? Once again of the vaccines work, why do you care if I choose not to get one?
Because Fauci said so, and he wouldn't lie!/