Discussion about this post

User's avatar
donna sherwood's avatar

He should not consider it. From start to finish she exhibited conduct which indicates her unsuitability as a wife and mother. She didn’t know her best friend had a low character ? Come on. One thing to return home and calmly tell him of the accusation and talk it out quite another to immediately fly off handle storm out and send police for children. The one inviolable rule is one never involves kids in these events protecting them from any adverse information they are not directly involved in. You speak well of each other providing as limited info as possible. In a sane world the children would be awarded to him with only supervised visits with her if any. Her actions border on child abuse and are enough to make one feel ill, in such a situation one’s children should be one’s primary concern heartbreaking to think what she put them through

Expand full comment
David Baker's avatar

Absolutely not.

She made a life-changing decision for her entire family, irretrievably breaking apart their family, on the word of one person without even asking her husband and father of her children for his side of the issue. She never charged him, never let him defend himself, just found him guilty on the basis of one person's word.

That's inexcusable. You never make any consequential decision without consulting both sides. She ruined his life. She ruined their children's lives.

She can never make that right. He should get the kids, house, and dog.

And why would she have as a friend, such a misandrist harpy in the first place?

Expand full comment
26 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?